Ivanka Trump's qualification for sitting in at the G20? She's part of the 1% | Arwa Mahdawi | Opinion
I donât know how she does it all! This weekend, Ivanka Trump could have been partying in the Hamptons but, selflessly, was politicking in Hamburg instead. On Saturday, the first daughter was spotted taking her fatherâs place at a session on African migration and health at the G20 summit, while the president stepped away for another meeting.
One might think that Ivankaâs efforts to aid the afflicted in Africa would have been applauded, but no. The special assistant to the president immediately faced a barrage of vicious criticism, with losers and haters accusing her of nepotism and being unqualified to practice diplomacy at such a high level.
Maxine Waters, for example, a Democratic congresswoman, told MSNBC that it didnât make sense that Ivanka was at âa very important meeting that she knows nothing aboutâ. Waters said: âShe cannot in any way deal with those members who are there representing those countries. She doesnât know anything about these issues.â
Now, Iâll freely admit that Iâve been critical of Ivanka in the past. Iâve found it troubling that America appears to be becoming the Saudi Arabia of the west, with nepotism running rife. Iâve accused Ivanka of hypocrisy for constantly claiming that she wants to empower women â" all the while standing silently by as her father takes funding away from organizations such as Planned Parenthood and launches vicious personal attacks against women via Twitter. And Iâve expressed concern that Ivanka occupies such a powerful position in the White House despite being unelected.
Nevertheless, I think itâs unfair to say that Ivanka was unqualified to take her fatherâs place at the G20 Summit. In my opinion, she was more than qualified to do so. You see, Ivanka is rich and in todayâs world â" a world where eight people have as much combined wealth as half of the human race â" money is the only qualification you need.
The Trump administration, for example, is the wealthiest in modern US history and the president has justified this by explaining that it simply doesnât make sense to have âa poor personâ in charge of the economy.
Money and politics have become indelibly intertwined. The G20 may be an official forum for world leaders, but dollar-driven diplomacy is happening all the time, in less formal settings. Last weekend, for example, Ivanka and her husband, Jared Kushner, were at a shindig in the Hamptons, drinking cocktails with the likes of Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer and billionaire George Soros, who is one of the most vociferous critics of President Trump.
It seems that while the ultra-rich may have their political differences they are still bound together by their money. The 1% is its own political party: entirely unelected but incredibly powerful.
Every day, weâre seeing the Trump administrationâs actions become normalized. There may have been outrage about Ivankaâs high-profile appearance on the world stage, but the amount of wealth concentrated in the Trump administration means that they seem to have carte blanche to do as they please.
Even Angela Merkel was quick to defend Ivanka sitting in for her father. According to reports by Bloomberg she said: âThe delegations themselves decide, should the president not be present for a meeting, who will then take over and sit in the chair.â
Last weekendâs Hamptonâs party was hosted by Lally Weymouth, who is the former owner of the Washington Post and currently a senior associate editor there. The Washington Postâs motto is âdemocracy dies in darknessâ. Itâs becoming increasingly apparent that democracy doesnât die in darkness. It dies in the glittering lights of Hamptons cocktail parties.
0 Response to "Ivanka Trump's qualification for sitting in at the G20? She's part of the 1% | Arwa Mahdawi | Opinion"
Posting Komentar