Who'd want Scaramucci's job now? In Trump's White House, no one comes out alive | Lucia Graves | Opinion
Itâs been a very bad week for Anthony Scaramucci, who, after getting sacked from his marriage, got sacked from his job.
Heâs dead even to his alma mater â" Harvard law schoolâs alumni directory, in an erroneous report, apparently declared him deceased.
That his stint in the public eye lasted less than two weeks, though, should be less a punchline than it is edifying. The lesson: there is no worse job than trying to speak for Trump.
Though his entire White House has been full of political upheaval, with jobs changing over and positions going unfilled, itâs not by chance the the role of spokesperson is most fraught.
Under any president itâs a job that requires answering to the public, and if you work for Trump, that means obfuscating all the time. It also means, more than any other single person, and there are plenty within the White House, youâre the fallguy to absorb Trumpâs hit.
If anyone could have succeeded in this line of thankless work, it should have been Scaramucci. After all he was in many ways the spitting image of his boss: petty and vain, if endlessly entertaining, a man who loves â" above all â" the sight of his own face on TV.
Most tellingly, perhaps, heâs loyalty-obsessed but disloyal himself. A strange distinction indeed for a guy who backed any candidate other than Trump as recently as last year, and fundraised for Obama in 2008.
His disloyalty was perhaps on display last week when his wife reportedly left him for being so âhell-bentâ on the White House, relentlessly â" and opportunistically â" courting Trump after his presidential rise. In January he sold his $11m stake in SkyBridge Capital in anticipation of a White House job.
Whether the details of the divorce report are true, whatâs clear is he was willing to sacrifice everything: family, finance, reputation. Itâs the same win-at-all-costs drive weâve seen displayed repeatedly in Trump.
Then Trump turned around and sacrificed him.
He had been hired, itâs been said, as a tool to hasten the departure of Reince Priebus. And here, the loyalty flip again: though Scaramucci had once described his relationship with Priebus as one of âbrothersâ upon arriving in the White House, he went on the attack.
Later, he sought to clarify that he and Priebus were like feuding biblical brothers Cain and Abel â" but as we now see, in the Trump White House version of the story, no one comes out alive.
The move was said to come at the request of Trumpâs new chief of staff, John F Kelly, the latest dummy to buy into Trumpâs game. âMr Scaramucci felt it was best to give chief of staff John Kelly a clean slate and the ability to build his own team,â read a statement from the White House. Whether it was issued by axed spokesman Sean Spicer or current deputy, Sarah Huckabee Sanders, was somewhat comically unclear.
What isnât is that there will be no clean slates, as the White House seeks to pivot away from turmoil and toward passing its tax cut package: whoever fills his shoes will continue the circus anew before being sacrificed, in an oft-repeated ritual, on Trumpâs altar.
For the president has always been willing to betray his political allies without a second thought, even as he demands comic levels of fealty from his underlings.
And having watched the rapid unraveling of the former family man known as Scaramucci, no person in their right mind would take the job now.
0 Response to "Who'd want Scaramucci's job now? In Trump's White House, no one comes out alive | Lucia Graves | Opinion"
Posting Komentar