South Koreaâs inequality paradox: long life, good health and poverty | Inequality
Earlier this year, an international team of scientists made the stunning prediction that women in South Korea born in 2030 can expect to live, on average, until they are 90, taking them past Japan to the summit of the global longevity table.
The study, published in the Lancet, marked the first time average lifespans for men or women anywhere in the world have exceeded nine decades.
South Koreans, it forecast, will experience the biggest rise in life expectancy in the industrialised world, with women adding 6.6 years to their average lifespan by 2030 compared with 2010. The prognosis was similarly encouraging for South Korean men, who will edge ahead of other nations with a life expectancy of 84.
The findings underlined South Koreaâs emergence from the ashes of the 1950-53 Korean war and its transformation into a successful exporter of everything from consumer electronics and smartphones to kimchi and K-Pop.
But the report also exposed a paradox. While South Koreaâs soaring rise in life expectancy is expected to continue, almost half of its citizens aged over 65 now live in relative poverty, according to OECD data.
The survey found that 48.6% of South Koreaâs elderly were in poverty (defined as earning 50% or less of median household income) in 2011, the highest level among the 34 OECD countries.
About a quarter of them live alone, and high levels of isolation and depression have led to a dramatic rise in elderly suicide, from 34 per 100,000 people in 2000 to 72 in 2010. Anecdotal evidence suggests many decide to take their own lives to avoid becoming a burden to their families.
âLife expectancy here has grown faster than in any other country in the world,â says Shin Kwang-yeong, a professor of sociology at Chung-Ang University in Seoul. âBut the speed of ageing has been so fast that the majority of elderly people here now live in relative poverty.â
No savings and no family support
At Tapgol Park in Seoul, dozens of people form a line to receive free lunches at a facility run by a Buddhist temple. Above the entrance is a sign that reads: âYou are our hope.â
The cafeteria, which is open all year round, used to serve about 140 people a day, but the number has risen recently to more than 200, says Kang So-yoon, a volunteer.
âThe main reason is because the economy is in bad shape and older people are struggling to find work,â she says. âFor some, this is the only meal they will have all day. If they donât have children to look after them, we are all they have. Theyâd have to beg on the street otherwise.â
Ironically, part of the reason for their plight may be the cost of supporting their own offspring. âWhile they were still working,â says Shin, âmany elderly people were unable to put aside enough savings for later in life because they spent too much on their childrenâs education.â
A woman in her late 70s says she canât afford to feed herself on her pension. âI come here for free meals,â says the woman, who declines to give her name. âMy children canât help me because they are struggling financially themselves. I donât want much, but a bit more money every month would be a great help.â
The traditional expectation that children will perform their filial duty and look after their parents in old age has stifled the emergence of a welfare state able to cope with South Koreaâs rapidly ageing society, according to Shin.
âTraditionally, observance of Confucian ethics meant it was taken for granted that children would look after their elderly parents,â he explains. âBut the family unit has undergone a tremendous transformation. Far fewer old people in South Korea live with their married children than in, say, Japan. And the increasing polarisation of South Korean society means it is getting harder for adult children to support their parents financially.â
Outside the cafe, the neighbourhoodâs auxiliary âsilverâ economy is in full flow, with cheap second-hand watches, jewellery and clothes laid out on the pavement encircling the park. Every now and then, an old man or woman passes by pulling rickety wooden handcarts loaded with piles of collected cardboard and paper they can sell for a few thousand won a day.
Among the parkâs regular visitors is Kim Jin-yang, a 72-year-old who fought in the Vietnam war, receives a veteranâs payment on top of his basic pension and has developed health problems caused by exposure to Agent Orange.
âI served my country, yet I got next to nothing from the government,â says Kim, who worked in logistics alongside American troops. âBut I have adjusted my lifestyle according to my means, and I can just about get by.â
Affordable universal healthcare
The financial plight of older South Koreans emerged as a key issue in Mayâs presidential election, which was won by the left-leaning former human rights lawyer, Moon Jae-in.
Moon, whose victory was due in part to public anger over the rising income gap and record youth unemployment under his conservative predecessor, Park Geun-hye, has made welfare reform a priority.
He has pledged to raise the basic pension from just over 200,000 won (138 GBP) to 300,000 won per month, and to double the number of job openings for older workers to 800,000, coupled with significant monthly wage increases. He also plans to subsidise the treatment of Alzheimerâs and other forms of dementia, make more money available for caregivers, and increase social housing provision for elderly people.
Like Japan, South Korea is expected to undergo rapid demographic change in the coming decades â" with the proportion of over-65s predicted to increase dramatically to 40% of the population by 2060, compared to 13% today, according to Statistics Korea.
âOver the last 20 years, the rate of increase of life expectancy in South Korea has been very steep, with no indication of slowing down; hence the high levels projected in 2030,â says Dr Vasilis Kontis, the longevity studyâs lead author.
Kontis, from the School of Public Health at Imperial College London, agrees there is an âapparent contradictionâ between the countryâs pre-eminent life expectancy projections, and its relative poverty data.
0 Response to "South Koreaâs inequality paradox: long life, good health and poverty | Inequality"
Posting Komentar